Rapier:Authorization process example - Re-authorization procedure: Difference between revisions

From Marshal Rules Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
AngeleDeSavigny (talk | contribs)
ArcheryEditor, ArmoredCombatEditor, ArmoredSteelCombatEditor, Editor, EquestrianEditor, FencingEditor, GlobalEditor, HarnischfechtenEditor, RapierEditor, SiegeEditor, SocietyMarshal, ThrownWeaponsEditor, YouthMartialEditor, Bureaucrats, editor, Interface administrators, Suppressors, Administrators
2,038 edits
Approved for commentary 18 November 2025
 
AngeleDeSavigny (talk | contribs)
ArcheryEditor, ArmoredCombatEditor, ArmoredSteelCombatEditor, Editor, EquestrianEditor, FencingEditor, GlobalEditor, HarnischfechtenEditor, RapierEditor, SiegeEditor, SocietyMarshal, ThrownWeaponsEditor, YouthMartialEditor, Bureaucrats, editor, Interface administrators, Suppressors, Administrators
2,038 edits
Approved for commentary by the Board of Directors 25 January 2026 as part of Cut & Thrust
 
Line 3: Line 3:
#This re-authorization procedure requires:
#This re-authorization procedure requires:
##The candidate, who has enough experience or training to be ready to authorize.
##The candidate, who has enough experience or training to be ready to authorize.
##A marshal, who is warranted to conduct authorizations for rapier combat in the kingdom.
##A marshal, who is warranted to conduct authorizations for this martial discipline in the kingdom.
#Regardless of how recently the fighter's authorization has lapsed, the authorizing marshal must test the fighter on their knowledge of the rules, particularly any rules that have changed within the last 4 years.
#Regardless of how recently the fighter's authorization has lapsed, the authorizing marshal must test the fighter on their knowledge of the rules, particularly any rules that have changed within the last 4 years.
#If the authorizing marshal has not seen the participant fight recently enough to confirm that they still meet the required competencies, observe them during combat and confirm that they are still competent, or run through the practical test.
#If the authorizing marshal has not seen the participant fight recently enough to confirm that they still meet the required competencies, observe them during combat and confirm that they are still competent, or run through the practical test.
#If a fighter has been sanctioned (e.g. had their authorization removed or suspended), the authorizing marshal must confirm that the issues relating to the sanction have been addressed.
#If a fighter has been sanctioned (e.g. had their authorization removed or suspended), the authorizing marshal must confirm that the issues relating to the sanction have been addressed. Confirmation must be obtained from the office that issued the sanction.

Latest revision as of 10:08, 30 January 2026

Re-authorization procedure

  1. This re-authorization procedure is for renewing an existing or recently expired authorization.
  2. This re-authorization procedure requires:
    1. The candidate, who has enough experience or training to be ready to authorize.
    2. A marshal, who is warranted to conduct authorizations for this martial discipline in the kingdom.
  3. Regardless of how recently the fighter's authorization has lapsed, the authorizing marshal must test the fighter on their knowledge of the rules, particularly any rules that have changed within the last 4 years.
  4. If the authorizing marshal has not seen the participant fight recently enough to confirm that they still meet the required competencies, observe them during combat and confirm that they are still competent, or run through the practical test.
  5. If a fighter has been sanctioned (e.g. had their authorization removed or suspended), the authorizing marshal must confirm that the issues relating to the sanction have been addressed. Confirmation must be obtained from the office that issued the sanction.
Retrieved from "http://society-rules.fullmesh.co.nz/index.php?title=Rapier:Authorization_process_example_-_Re-authorization_procedure&oldid=3307"